Re: Debian Maintainers GR Proposal
On Fri, Jun 22, 2007 at 11:05:04AM +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> On Thursday 21 June 2007 19:22, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > The NM process is about making new DDs -- who participate fully in
> > the project, and understand and agree with its goals. Not every useful
> > contributor to Debian actually wants that status -- Matthew Garrett's one
> > example of a former DD who'd like to contribute to Debian without being
> > a DD, and this is a way of making that more effective. Likewise there are
> > plenty of people who'd like to make a small contribution to Debian without
> > having to obtain the level of knowledge and experience we expect of DDs.
> I'm not really convinced that we should adapt our processes to an existing DD
> who gives up his rights to upload, and then later would like to get upload
> rights again.
Not for the benefit of that developer, but for our benefit. I have no fear
at all of Matthew Garrett doing an incompetent job of preparing packages;
why should we make it hard for *Debian* to take advantage of his
(Repeat this argument x times for all the NMs we currently have that are
already being trusted to prepare their own packages for sponsorship, with no
real review by the sponsors)
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.