Re: Anton's amendment

[Thomas Bushnell BSG <tb@becket.net>]

Yavor Doganov <yavor@doganov.org> writes:

> This is not a proper example.  Non-modifiability of secondary.c may
> obstruct further improvements of the program.  This is not the case
> with the invariant sections, which do not prevent the manual to be
> enhanced.  

Sometimes an enhancement requires removing invariant sections.  For
example, if you want to turn the manual into a reference card.

Sometimes an enhancement requires rewriting invariant sections.  For
example, to correct factual mistakes or express more correct opinions.