Re: Anton's amendment
"Wesley J. Landaker" <wjl@icecavern.net> wrote:
> My argument is that it's an absolutely and completely valid
> interpretation--in the full spirit of the DFSG and the Debian project--of
> "The license must permit modifications" to say that it means instead, "The
> license must permit reasonable modification."
Even if that were true, how could it justify invariant sections? How
could removing an off-topic section not be "reasonable"?
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX)
Reply to: