[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Anton's amendment



"Wesley J. Landaker" <wjl@icecavern.net> writes:

> I really see this as a push to kill a valid interpretation by forcing it to 
> have a supermajority. I would feel the same way even if the tables were 
> turned in what option was being made to meet 3:1.

Are you saying that Manoj is acting in bad faith?

Thomas



Reply to: