Re: Minimum standard of decency, was: Amendment: GFDL is compatible with DFSG

To: debian-vote@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Minimum standard of decency, was: Amendment: GFDL is compatible with DFSG
From: Thomas Bushnell BSG <tb@becket.net>
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2006 16:47:16 -0800
Message-id: <[🔎] 873bj5te97.fsf@becket.becket.net>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 1138667577.845508.8634.nullmailer@klnet.towers.org.uk> (MJ Ray's message of "Tue, 31 Jan 2006 00:25:48 +0000")
References: <[🔎] 20060122234540.GA11375@debian.inet> <[🔎] 20060123012938.GB7011@country.grep.be> <[🔎] 20060129130955.GB25167@taz.net.au> <[🔎] 20060129161326.GA15861@country.grep.be> <[🔎] 20060129222415.GF12892@taz.net.au> <[🔎] 1138581425.5950.78.camel@esme.liw.iki.fi> <[🔎] 87u0bl2xov.fsf@becket.becket.net> <[🔎] 87zmldjrze.fsf@hardknott.home.whinlatter.ukfsn.org> <[🔎] 1138667577.845508.8634.nullmailer@klnet.towers.org.uk>

MJ Ray <mjr@phonecoop.coop> writes:

> Nevertheless, Craig Sanders's colourful rants break the lists code
> of conduct far more clearly than posting satire to -devel-announce.
> Where are the winged angels of vengence? But then, the d-d-a ban
> didn't look like it was about enforcing the list codes anyway.

I have been upset with Craig for years, but the project decided that
his "colorful rants" are acceptible conduct.

Reply to:

References:
- Amendment: GFDL is compatible with DFSG
  - From: Anton Zinoviev <zinoviev@debian.org>
- Re: Amendment: GFDL is compatible with DFSG
  - From: Wouter Verhelst <wouter@debian.org>
- Re: Amendment: GFDL is compatible with DFSG
  - From: Craig Sanders <cas@taz.net.au>
- Re: Amendment: GFDL is compatible with DFSG
  - From: Wouter Verhelst <wouter@debian.org>
- Re: Amendment: GFDL is compatible with DFSG
  - From: Craig Sanders <cas@taz.net.au>
- Re: Amendment: GFDL is compatible with DFSG
  - From: Lars Wirzenius <liw@liw.iki.fi>
- Re: Amendment: GFDL is compatible with DFSG
  - From: Thomas Bushnell BSG <tb@becket.net>
- Re: Amendment: GFDL is compatible with DFSG
  - From: Roger Leigh <rleigh@whinlatter.ukfsn.org>
- Minimum standard of decency, was: Amendment: GFDL is compatible with DFSG
  - From: MJ Ray <mjr@phonecoop.coop>

Prev by Date: Minimum standard of decency, was: Amendment: GFDL is compatible with DFSG
Next by Date: Re: Minimum standard of decency, was: Amendment: GFDL is compatible with DFSG
Previous by thread: Minimum standard of decency, was: Amendment: GFDL is compatible with DFSG
Next by thread: Re: Minimum standard of decency, was: Amendment: GFDL is compatible with DFSG
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread