Re: Amendment: GFDL is compatible with DFSG

[Frank Küster <frank@debian.org>]

Peter Samuelson <peter@p12n.org> wrote:

> [Russ Allbery]
>> If we're going to put all the options on the ballot, let's go ahead
>> and put them *all* on the ballot so that no significant group of DDs
>> can later claim that their opinion wasn't represented by the choices.
>
> I think everyone is forgetting this one (IMHO pretty reasonable)
> option:
>
> - Works licensed under the terms of the GNU FDL but with no
>   invariant-foo comply (or may comply) with the DFSG, but we still
>   refuse to distribute them, because of the significant practical
>   problems that this would cause both for us and for our users.

If you propose this as an amendment or alternative text, I'd second it
(especially if the text uses "comply" and "may comply" equally).

Regards, Frank
-- 
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX)