[Frank Küster] > > - Works licensed under the terms of the GNU FDL but with no > > invariant-foo comply (or may comply) with the DFSG, but we still > > refuse to distribute them, because of the significant practical > > problems that this would cause both for us and for our users. > > If you propose this as an amendment or alternative text, I'd second it > (especially if the text uses "comply" and "may comply" equally). I'd love to but I'm not a Debian developer. Peter
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature