[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Proposal to delay the decition of the DPL of the withdrawal of the Package Policy Committee delegation

Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 09:40:43PM +0200, Martin Wuertele wrote:
> > I disagree with the Policy delegation decision of our DPL [1] and
> > therefore propose a resolution as defined in section 4.2.2 of the Debian
> > constitution to delay the decision of the Debian Project Leader keeping
> > the Package Policy Committee as defined[2] in place until the Debian
> > Project Leader has found at least three people "who'll be active in
> > maintaining policy according to the policy process"[3] and delegates
> > them. Consequently the REJECT for uploads of debian-policy must be
> > removed.
> > My reason for this proposal is the impression the revocation of the
> > delegation is based on the disagreement of the interpretation of the
> > policy between the chair of the Package Policy Committee and the Debian
> > Project Leader.
> So you think it's wrong for the DPL to overrule the policy delegate because
> of a disagreement, and therefore in your disagreement you wish to overrule
> the DPL?

I'd rather interpret the proposal as:

s/overrule/postpone the decision of/
until new CTTE people have been assigned.



There are lies, statistics and benchmarks.

Reply to: