Seconded. Regards, Joey Martin Wuertele wrote: > I disagree with the Policy delegation decision of our DPL  and > therefore propose a resolution as defined in section 4.2.2 of the Debian > constitution to delay the decision of the Debian Project Leader keeping > the Package Policy Committee as defined in place until the Debian > Project Leader has found at least three people "who'll be active in > maintaining policy according to the policy process" and delegates > them. Consequently the REJECT for uploads of debian-policy must be > removed. > > My reason for this proposal is the impression the revocation of the > delegation is based on the disagreement of the interpretation of the > policy between the chair of the Package Policy Committee and the Debian > Project Leader. > >  http://lists.debian.org/debian-project/2006/10/msg00233.html >  http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/06/msg00017.html >  http://lists.debian.org/debian-project/2006/10/msg00238.html > > yours Martin -- There are lies, statistics and benchmarks.
Description: Digital signature