Re: GPG key problem with new vote keys
On Thu, 12 Oct 2006 14:17:25 -0500, Steve Langasek <email@example.com> said:
> On Mon, Oct 09, 2006 at 12:25:42PM +0200, Toni Mueller wrote:
>> I'm using mutt and gpg 1.4.5, but have severe problems using the
>> vote keys. First, I do something like 'Ctrl-K' to import the
>> key. This sometimes gives me a message like 'processed: 0,
>> imported: 1'. When I then try to use a key like
>> "firstname.lastname@example.org", gpg tells me that it doesn't find such
>> a key. Any ideas about what that could be? Other keys seem to work
> The purpose of the vote keys is to provide you the means of
> verifying the authenticity of replies to your vote. TTBOMK, devotee
> still does not support encrypted ballots (with no plans to change
> this), so no encryption keypair is generated.
Err, we have supported encryupted ballots for over an year
now, actually. 2005-04-04,
And I did think I generated both a signing key and an
__> gpg --with-colons --list-keys gr_affirm
pub:-:1024:17:1A3A2164B11223B4:2006-10-05:2006-10-26::-:Affirm the DPL vote key (Ephemeral Key) <email@example.com>::scESC:
Does seem like the encryption key is present.
When you are in it up to your ears, keep your mouth shut.
Manoj Srivastava <firstname.lastname@example.org> <http://www.debian.org/~srivasta/>
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C