Re: Call for voting period to start on the firmware vote
On Thu, 05 Oct 2006, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On Thu, 5 Oct 2006 17:04:32 +1000, Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au> said:
> > I don't think it's worth further delaying this vote to include this
> > position statement; as per [0] the minimum discussion period for
> > Manoj's amendment as accepted by Frederik [1] ended 4th Oct 2006
> > 19:53:58 UTC, which is about 11 hours ago; so we could get on with
> > calling for a vote and have this over and done with in a little over
> > a week if the proposers and seconders are willing.
>
> > [0] http://lists.debian.org/debian-project/2006/10/msg00005.html[1]
> > http://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2006/09/msg00567.html
>
> This is a call for votes to start on the firmware resolution:
> The proposed ballot is:
> [ ] Release Etch even with kernel firmware issues
> [ ] Special exception to DFSG #2 for firmware as long as required [3:1]
> [ ] Further discussion
>
> I'm attaching the proposed WML page for this vote (vote_007.wml).
Are there any objections to shortening the vote period for this vote?
Don Armstrong
--
LEADERSHIP -- A form of self-preservation exhibited by people with
autodestructive imaginations in order to ensure that when it comes to
the crunch it'll be someone else's bones which go crack and not their
own.
-- The HipCrime Vocab by Chad C. Mulligan
(John Brunner _Stand On Zanzibar_ p256-7)
http://www.donarmstrong.com http://rzlab.ucr.edu
Reply to: