[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Splitting out Choice #1 from vote_004

On Tue, 26 Sep 2006 13:56:21 +0200, Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl> said: 

> On Tuesday 26 September 2006 11:49, Steve Langasek wrote:
>> I agree with Don.  If this proposal is going to go to a vote, it
>> should go to a vote separately from the votes about exceptions, so
>> that we can get a clear answer to the exception question without
>> the outcome being tainted by either voter confusion leading to
>> strategic voting, or orthogonal statements that are widely
>> supported by the community but which tell us nothing about what we
>> should do for etch.

> I can agree that the vote should be separate from the exceptions for
> Etch.  However, I do not think Don's proposal should stand on its
> own without amendments or counter-proposals and that was the main
> point of my objection.

        Do you have an amendment to Don's proposal in mind?

Revenge is a form of nostalgia.
Manoj Srivastava   <srivasta@debian.org>  <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B  924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C

Reply to: