Re: Splitting out Choice #1 from vote_004
On Tue, 26 Sep 2006 13:56:21 +0200, Frans Pop <email@example.com> said:
> On Tuesday 26 September 2006 11:49, Steve Langasek wrote:
>> I agree with Don. If this proposal is going to go to a vote, it
>> should go to a vote separately from the votes about exceptions, so
>> that we can get a clear answer to the exception question without
>> the outcome being tainted by either voter confusion leading to
>> strategic voting, or orthogonal statements that are widely
>> supported by the community but which tell us nothing about what we
>> should do for etch.
> I can agree that the vote should be separate from the exceptions for
> Etch. However, I do not think Don's proposal should stand on its
> own without amendments or counter-proposals and that was the main
> point of my objection.
Do you have an amendment to Don's proposal in mind?
Revenge is a form of nostalgia.
Manoj Srivastava <firstname.lastname@example.org> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C