On Tuesday 26 September 2006 11:49, Steve Langasek wrote: > I agree with Don. If this proposal is going to go to a vote, it should > go to a vote separately from the votes about exceptions, so that we can > get a clear answer to the exception question without the outcome being > tainted by either voter confusion leading to strategic voting, or > orthogonal statements that are widely supported by the community but > which tell us nothing about what we should do for etch. I can agree that the vote should be separate from the exceptions for Etch. However, I do not think Don's proposal should stand on its own without amendments or counter-proposals and that was the main point of my objection.
Attachment:
pgpwUH5PRZRQs.pgp
Description: PGP signature