Re: Firmware & Social Contract: GR proposal
Anthony Towns wrote:
> > 1. I'm utterly frustrated with your ways. The mail on d-d-a could not
> > have any other answer that "please release etch in time", that's
> > something a perfect moron could have predicted without a doubt.
> 26% of the people on the forums said supporting hardware requiring
> non-free firmware was the highest priority; another 15% said not shipping
> sourceless firmware in main was; that's 41% all up or 86 people.
Probably > 50% of the people working with computers want to run
Windows, does that mean we should kick Linux out and use the kernel
from Redmond instead?
Open source is important from a technical angle. -- Linus Torvalds