Re: Amendment: special exception for firmware because of technical limitations
- To: email@example.com
- Subject: Re: Amendment: special exception for firmware because of technical limitations
- From: Aurelien Jarno <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Tue, 05 Sep 2006 11:36:27 +0200
- Message-id: <44FD451B.email@example.com>
- In-reply-to: <20060829181518.GC879@kitenet.net>
- References: <20060822221804.GC28755@mauritius.dodds.net> <1156585040.6467.62.camel@tomoyo> <20060829130157.GA15268@bode.aurel32.net> <20060829181518.GC879@kitenet.net>
Joey Hess a écrit :
Aurelien Jarno wrote:
Not also that I found sad that the DPL try to kill this GR with his
latest mail to debian-announce. The problem is known for a long time.
How does posting straw polls of our users and developers to d-d-a manage
to look to you like an attempt to stop this GR?
Given the latest mail from Anthony Towns ("Firmware & Social Contract:
GR proposal"), it looks like I was correct. He just try to stop this GR
by proposing his own one.
If he wanted to help, it should have been done that before, not a 3
months before the announced date of the release. And also not while
proposals are beeing discussed. He just want to be awarded because he
found a solution to the problem.
I wish that I had your mind-reading capabilities. No, strike that, your
world seems worse with it then mine without it.
Looks like my mind-reading capabilities are working very well, I should
use them more often.
.''`. Aurelien Jarno | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
: :' : Debian developer | Electrical Engineer
`. `' firstname.lastname@example.org | email@example.com
`- people.debian.org/~aurel32 | www.aurel32.net