On Sun, Mar 05, 2006 at 03:27:03PM -0500, Benjamin Seidenberg wrote: > If you were not running for DPL, which of the other candiates would you > most likely vote for (or since you are running, rank as '2' on your > ballot)? Why? > Which of the other canidate's platform statements do you agree with, and > which do you not? Of the platforms posted, I agree with Lars' the most (in particular, all his "major goals" exactly match what I think's important), but since he de-nominated, I don't get to vote for him. At the moment, I'd probably go for Steve, whose "Technical standards" bulletpoint probably comes closest to what I think's important. > If you are elected as DPL, do you think that you will > try to implement any goals of the other candiates that weren't in your > own platform? Not directly; I think my platform has enough stuff for me to do. But given they've already volunteered, I'd probably aim to recruit Steve, Bill and/or Lars to see what they could come up with as far as making having arguments in Debian more pleasant; and I'd definitely like to see Andreas go further on some of his ideas on the "resource allocation" front. I believe Manoj has already painted a target on Jeroen's back to get some asistance in the project secretary role. Cheers, aj
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature