Re: DFSG4 and combined works
On Fri, Feb 10, 2006 at 02:29:20PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> Anton Zinoviev <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> > This is strange. :-) The program is covered under BSD license and you
> > say it is non-free.
> No. The resulting program is covered under the BSD license and the
> GFDL together.
This was not the license I suggested. For the non-commented parts of
the source files of GDB the license I suggested gives you the right to
choose between GFDL and BSD.
I have the right to use such dual licensing. By placing the entire
sources under GFDL I have satisfied the requirements of GDFL. On the
other hand the non-commented parts do not depend on the manual in any
way so I am allowed license them under BSD additionaly. The binary
depends only on the non-commented parts so it is covered under BSD.