Re: GFDL GR: Amendment: invariant-less in main v2

[Adeodato Simó <dato@net.com.org.es>]

* Nathanael Nerode [Fri, 10 Feb 2006 01:51:33 -0500]:

Hi,

> So, does this mean that if this amendment is passed, outlawing storing a copy 
> of a document with non-world-readable permission is considered an acceptable, 
> free restriction by the Developers?  Really?

> I *hope* that this amendment is simply supposed to mean that the Developers 
> don't believe that the DRM clause imposes such restrictions (despite the fact 
> that reading it literally, it does).  But at the moment, which of these two 
> positions is being pushed by the amendment is not clear to me.  Adeodato?

  The latter. From the last paragraph in my mail:

| I don't see much point in carrying details about the other two issues,
| when they don't affect us at all. 

  Cheers,

-- 
Adeodato Simó                                     dato at net.com.org.es
Debian Developer                                  adeodato at debian.org
 
Loan-department manager:  "There isn't any fine print.  At these
interest rates, we don't need it."