Re: GFDL GR: Amendment: invariant-less in main v2
> > I *hope* that this amendment is simply supposed to mean that the
> > don't believe that the DRM clause imposes such restrictions (despite the
> > that reading it literally, it does). But at the moment, which of these
> > positions is being pushed by the amendment is not clear to me. Adeodato?
> The latter. From the last paragraph in my mail:
Thanks for replying on the public mailing list and making this clear to
everyone including me.
That eases my worries about this. Because it means that if a copyright holder
actually does start talking about enforcing the GFDL on a work in a
literalistic way which includes all the restrictions we find unacceptable,
Debian *will* remove that work. Which is what really matters. :-)
Nathanael Nerode <email@example.com>
Make sure your vote will count.