[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Anton's amendment



Em Qui, 2006-02-02 às 12:44 +0200, Anton Zinoviev escreveu:
> On Wed, Feb 01, 2006 at 06:32:50PM -0300, Daniel Ruoso wrote:
> > I must remeber that, in this case, you're not letting the user judge if
> > something fits or not to his needs.
> > This breaks freedom 1[1], which DFSG3 clearly refers to.
> Notice that freedom 1 doesn't talk about distribution.  However if you
> interpret "need" as "need" and not as "whatever the user decides are
> his needs" then this modification would be useful and required by
> freedom 3.

Sorry, it's "adapt to your needs", not "adapt to the needs the author
judges reasonable"... You're forcing your interpretation beyond
reasonable limits...

> > As I said more than three times in this thread, I can show you one
> > document[1] that DFSG clearly refers to which contradicts your
> > interpretation. Can you show me something like this that contradicts my
> > argument?
> I hope in this message I answered you.

No, you didn't. You're still using your own words to subvert the
common-sense interpretation of freedom. Please, point me to the
references that support your arguments.

daniel



Reply to: