[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Anton's amendment

Em Qua, 2006-02-01 às 23:28 +0200, Anton Zinoviev escreveu:
> On Wed, Feb 01, 2006 at 03:11:25PM -0300, Margarita Manterola wrote:
> > Ok, but by being invariant they are turning the documentation into
> > non-free documentation. As you say, people won't be able to change it,
> > therefore, it's a non-free text.
> The modifications that are permited by GFDL are enough to make useful
> modifications, that is to adapt the document and to improve it.

I must remeber that, in this case, you're not letting the user judge if
something fits or not to his needs. This breaks freedom 1[1], which
DFSG3 clearly refers to.

>  Yes, you can not do whatever you whish but this is not necessarily
>  the right interpretation of DFSG.

Can you please give us references that support your argument?

As I said more than three times in this thread, I can show you one
document[1] that DFSG clearly refers to which contradicts your
interpretation. Can you show me something like this that contradicts my


[1] http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html

Reply to: