Re: Anton's amendment
On Wed, Feb 01, 2006 at 06:32:50PM -0300, Daniel Ruoso wrote:
> Em Qua, 2006-02-01 às 23:28 +0200, Anton Zinoviev escreveu:
> > On Wed, Feb 01, 2006 at 03:11:25PM -0300, Margarita Manterola wrote:
> > > Ok, but by being invariant they are turning the documentation into
> > > non-free documentation. As you say, people won't be able to change it,
> > > therefore, it's a non-free text.
> > The modifications that are permited by GFDL are enough to make useful
> > modifications, that is to adapt the document and to improve it.
>
> I must remeber that, in this case, you're not letting the user judge if
> something fits or not to his needs.
> This breaks freedom 1[1], which DFSG3 clearly refers to.
Notice that freedom 1 doesn't talk about distribution. However if you
interpret "need" as "need" and not as "whatever the user decides are
his needs" then this modification would be useful and required by
freedom 3.
> As I said more than three times in this thread, I can show you one
> document[1] that DFSG clearly refers to which contradicts your
> interpretation. Can you show me something like this that contradicts my
> argument?
I hope in this message I answered you.
Anton Zinoviev
Reply to: