Re: Anton's amendment
"Wesley J. Landaker" <wjl@icecavern.net> writes:
> If you are saying that "The license must permit modifications" has one, and
> only one interpretation, and that that interpretation is "The license must
> permit any and all modifications", then you are really doing the hair
> splitting, because that's not what it said. It's a perfectly valid
> interpreation, but it's not the one-and-only possible one that meets the
> spirit of the Debian project.
Actually, I think it does have one and only one interpretation.
The way to prove me wrong is to seriously say, "I think there is a
different interpretation which is plausible, and this is it: XXX."
And then, make that stick.
Thomas
Reply to: