Re: Anton's amendment
Thomas Bushnell BSG <tb@becket.net> writes:
> All they need to do, if you are right, is proceed to declare that
> their change is really just an interpretation of whatever is already
> there. And, by hypothesis, they can present a claim that heck, a
Actually, a group of developers, no matter how large, can proceed to
claim whatever they want, but the project's interpretation is up to
the secretary. If (s)he is in the minority of one, it is still _his_
interpretation that matters, nobody elses.
--
* Sufficiently advanced magic is indistinguishable from technology (T.P) *
* PGP public key available @ http://www.iki.fi/killer *
Reply to: