On Sun, Mar 06, 2005 at 02:15:00PM -0800, Jonathan Walther wrote: > On Sat, Mar 05, 2005 at 10:49:26PM +0900, Seo Sanghyeon wrote: > >1. How do you define "source code" yourself? > > Like pornography, I know "source code" when I see it. There may be some > edge cases where not everyone agrees what constitutes source code, but > porn is like that too. Where do you draw the line between a tasteful > nude and exploitive smut? Easy, willing cooperation of the model. Note that purely fictional artwork can never be "exploitive smut", because nobody is being exploited. (False dilemma, but admittedly it's the false dilemma posited by the US government to excuse their efforts to control the market) -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield : :' : http://www.debian.org/ | `. `' | `- -><- |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature