Re: Branden's time commitments (was: Re: followup to my time-management question)
On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 04:19:24PM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Sven Luther (sven.luther@wanadoo.fr) [050321 16:05]:
> > On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 12:35:15PM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > > * Daniel Stone (daniel@fooishbar.org) [050321 03:55]:
> > > > On Sun, Mar 20, 2005 at 06:35:01PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> > > > > Branden Robinson: eleven packages, two other jobs
> > > > > nine in good shape, two could be better.
> > > > > other jobs in good shape (though one, policy, might not really exist)
> > >
> > > > I would argue that xfree86 could be in far better shape; X.Org 6.7.0
> > > > was released in April 2004, 6.8.0 in August 2004 (IIRC), and there have
> > > > been two point releases of 6.8.x since. Despite the availability of
> > > > xorg packages, Debian is still languishing with XFree86 4.3 (release
> > > > date was February 2003, I believe).
>
> > > Just for the record, the release team asked for not updating X to X.org
> > > in sarge. Thanks, Branden, for respecting this.
>
> > But we could have had X.org in experimental [...]
>
> As the campaining period was already over at the time of writing my
> mail, I restricted myself to bring some hard facts up why we don't have
> x.org in unstable and sarge. I think it would be unfair on Branden to
> not tell them, but - well, I don't want to continue discussions after
> end of campaining.
Ok, point taken.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
Reply to: