Re: Branden's time commitments (was: Re: followup to my time-management question)
* Sven Luther (sven.luther@wanadoo.fr) [050321 16:05]:
> On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 12:35:15PM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > * Daniel Stone (daniel@fooishbar.org) [050321 03:55]:
> > > On Sun, Mar 20, 2005 at 06:35:01PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> > > > Branden Robinson: eleven packages, two other jobs
> > > > nine in good shape, two could be better.
> > > > other jobs in good shape (though one, policy, might not really exist)
> >
> > > I would argue that xfree86 could be in far better shape; X.Org 6.7.0
> > > was released in April 2004, 6.8.0 in August 2004 (IIRC), and there have
> > > been two point releases of 6.8.x since. Despite the availability of
> > > xorg packages, Debian is still languishing with XFree86 4.3 (release
> > > date was February 2003, I believe).
> > Just for the record, the release team asked for not updating X to X.org
> > in sarge. Thanks, Branden, for respecting this.
> But we could have had X.org in experimental [...]
As the campaining period was already over at the time of writing my
mail, I restricted myself to bring some hard facts up why we don't have
x.org in unstable and sarge. I think it would be unfair on Branden to
not tell them, but - well, I don't want to continue discussions after
end of campaining.
Cheers,
Andi
--
http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
PGP 1024/89FB5CE5 DC F1 85 6D A6 45 9C 0F 3B BE F1 D0 C5 D1 D9 0C
Reply to: