Re: Branden's time commitments
Daniel Stone <email@example.com> wrote:
>> >> On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 05:25:55PM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote:
>> >> > vendors, et al. But nevermind that. Can you make a case for sticking
>> >> > with XFree86? If you can, please do so.
> Yes, but my point is that there are no packages available for after
> sarge's release, and the plan seems to be very flimsy. I was talking
> about long-term plans in this case.
For me, concentrating on the sarge release is still a perfectly valid
reason not to prepare packages for after sarge's release.
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich