Re: Questions to all DPL candidates

To: debian-vote@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Questions to all DPL candidates
From: Andreas Barth <aba@not.so.argh.org>
Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2005 23:53:47 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 20050313225347.GQ12322@mails.so.argh.org>
Mail-followup-to: Andreas Barth <aba@not.so.argh.org>, debian-vote@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20050313203313.GA15465@reactor-core.org>
References: <[🔎] 20050313113000.GA11195@debian> <[🔎] 20050313203313.GA15465@reactor-core.org>

* Jonathan Walther (krooger@debian.org) [050313 21:35]:
> If it is non-free, then it doesn't belong in Debian.  We never should
> have created a non-free section in the first place.  If some outside,
> third party were to mirror the non-free section and maintain it as a
> separate distribution, usable with apt-get, that would be best.

You mean the decision of the developers in
http://www.debian.org/vote/2004/vote_002 is wrong?


Cheers,
Andi
-- 
   http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
   PGP 1024/89FB5CE5  DC F1 85 6D A6 45 9C 0F  3B BE F1 D0 C5 D1 D9 0C

Reply to:

References:
- Questions to all DPL candidates
  - From: Eduard Bloch <blade@debian.org>
- Re: Questions to all DPL candidates
  - From: Jonathan Walther <krooger@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: debian-women obscurity, was: Clarification about krooger's platform
Next by Date: Re: Question for the Debate/Candidates
Previous by thread: Re: Questions to all DPL candidates
Next by thread: Re: Questions to all DPL candidates
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread