On Tue, Jul 13, 2004 at 05:43:18PM +0100, Scott James Remnant wrote: > On Tue, 2004-07-13 at 11:13 -0500, Chris Cheney wrote: > > > On Tue, Jul 13, 2004 at 03:05:54PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote: > > > > > > Josselin Mouette wrote: > > > > > > >1. that the next Debian GNU/Linux release, codenamed "sarge", will=20 > > > > include the "amd64" architecture, based on the work currently hosted=20 > > > > at http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/ ; > > > > > > Which point of section 4.1 of the constitution do you believe this falls > > > under? > > > > 4.1 point 3 > > > > "3. Override any decision by the Project Leader of a Delegate." > > > Please provide information about the decision you are choosing to > override. Useful references would include message-ids from the Project > Leader or Delegate in which the decision was made. Several of the points in the GR fall back to the ftpmaster never communicates and thus there are no emails to quote. Its a decision through inaction. There isn't even an email about their current work on SCC yet. Supposedly it will be posted later this week. > > > >2. that non-compliance of that "amd64" distribution with the Linux=20 > > > > Standard Base specification for IA32 will not be considered a=20 > > > > release-critical bug; > > > > > > Which point of section 4.1 of the constitution do you believe this falls > > > under? > > > > 4.1 point 3 > > > > "3. Override any decision by the Project Leader of a Delegate." > > > Please provide information about the decision you are choosing to > override. Useful references would include message-ids from the Project > Leader or Delegate in which the decision was made. Other FHS/LSB violations have been overriden in the past this probably would not be a problem in practice but he wants to cover all his bases. > > > >3. that we will include it immediately in the "sid" distribution and=20 > > > > auto-building infrastructure, and take all appropriate steps so=20 > > > > that inclusion won't delay the release of "sarge" any further. > > > > > > Which point of section 4.1 of the constitution do you believe this falls > > > under? > > > > 4.1 point 3 > > > > "3. Override any decision by the Project Leader of a Delegate." > > > Please provide information about the decision you are choosing to > override. Useful references would include message-ids from the Project > Leader or Delegate in which the decision was made. This is also primarly blocked by ftpmaster, as mentioned above they don't respond to email. Chris
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature