Re: What your ballot should look like if you're in favor of releasing sarge
On Thu, Jun 24, 2004 at 12:57:20AM -0700, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> Hamish Moffatt <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> > That was because the voters were 20% of the developers, as you well
> > know. I'm also hoping that we've engaged enough of the developers that
> > we might get a representative vote this time.
> I see. Is that what the Constitution says? If you don't like who
> won, then just keep proposing GRs, claiming that not enough people
> voted last time? When you lose a vote, raise as big a stink as
> possible and have more votes? You really think this is a good
Not in general. In this case a number of developers feel (rightly or
wrongly) that they were misled by the previous ballot, and wanted
another chance to influence Debian policy.
I think that you can reasonably expect this to happen again next
time the developers feel they are misled.
I don't think we need to debate whether or not the ballot was misleading
Hamish Moffatt VK3SB <email@example.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org>