[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Proposal - Statement that Sarge will follow Woody requirement for main.

On Sat, 22 May 2004 01:41:13 +0200, Bill Allombert <allomber@math.u-bordeaux.fr> said: 

> One of the point of contention is whether the meaning of the SC was
> changed by the latest GR, and if yes, in what ways. I don't feel it
> was changed at all myself, so I feel uneasy to vote in favor of a
> proposal which imply otherwise. Also, in the group of developer that
> believe the meaning of the SC was changed, I expect they do not all
> share exactly the same view about how it was changed.

	Personally, I do believe thagt the changes to the SC were
 merely clarifications, and did not change the meaning of the SC,
 however, when it comes to release policies my individual opinion
 matters little.

	My amendment  is merely cognizant of the fact that something
 did change -- namely, the release policy, and I am told on the
 best of authority that the aforementioned GR was the direct cause of
 this change in Debian release policy.

	Surely hiding that serves no purpose?

Money is the root of all wealth.
Manoj Srivastava   <srivasta@debian.org>  <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05  CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B  924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C

Reply to: