Re: Proposal - Statement that Sarge will follow Woody requirement for main.
Bill Allombert <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> To the question whether the SC allows for Sarge to be released more
> or less as it is currently, Anthony has clearly stated he delegates
> the decision to the technical commity, which has replied that the
> developers could settle the issue by a GR.
Did the Technicall Committee really say officially that they refuse to
decide, or did only individual member say that they prefer a GR?
> We, Debian developers, issue the statement:
> "On the question on what software should be allowed in the main section
> of our archive (The official Debian distribution) for our forthcoming
> release code-named Sarge, we resolve that we will apply the same criterion
> as for our preceding release, code-named Woody."
Was the GFDL used in woody at all?
Frank Küster, Biozentrum der Univ. Basel
Abt. Biophysikalische Chemie