Re: Proposal to modify DFSG
Hi, Paul M Foster wrote:
> But specifically on the issues of documentation and licenses, it's
> patently obvious that this isn't "software" and shouldn't be treated as
> such. You can't go around randomly modifying RFCs and the GPL. That's
> the whole point of them.
*Sigh* Under the GFDL, there's a whole lot of other things you can't do
which make the whole mess anything *but* "patently obvious".
Please go on to debian.legal, or Manoj's GFDL page, if you want to learn