[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Proposal - Deferment of Changes from GR 2004-003



Dear Listmaster,

On Wed, Apr 28, 2004 at 08:58:02PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> Since you have shown yourself to be an unprincipled cad, the notion of
> you lecturing decent people about ethics is ironic in the extreme.

On Thu, Apr 29, 2004 at 03:38:41PM +1000, Craig Sanders wrote:
> eat shit and die, you worthless low-life verminous bag of pus

During the DPL campaign we discussed intervening to improve the level
of discussion in Debian [0].

I think the above lack of decorum is entirely beyond the pale, and in
no way aids in achieving a consensus on this issue, controversial as it
is. Could Thomas and Craig's posts to this list, at least on this topic,
be manually moderated for some time, or some other technical procedure be
put in place to help encourage a higher level of courtesy and productive
discussion?

Cheers,
aj

[0] http://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2004/debian-vote-200403/msg00979.html

-- 
Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
Don't assume I speak for anyone but myself. GPG signed mail preferred.

Protect Open Source in Australia from over-reaching changes to IP law
http://www.petitiononline.com/auftaip/ & http://www.linux.org.au/fta/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: