On Wed, Apr 28, 2004 at 02:15:00PM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote: > Andreas Barth wrote: > > * Martin Schulze (joey@infodrom.org) [040428 12:40]: > > > Raul Miller wrote: > > > > Do you have some proprosal to make on how you think this issue should > > > > be resolved? > > > Well, I do believe that non-program software should be as free as > > > program software, so I'd go the way Anthony described to resolve > > > this issue: i.e. help Nathanael to extract firmware blobs and > > > remove fdl documentation. For other stuff, we'll have to discuss > > > the issue, especially with fonts and the like. Discussion may > > > take on now, but the issue should probably be ignored for sarge, > > > so that there is a chance to release it anytime "soon". > > What is the difference between your proposal and the proposal for the > > next GR? > That it's no GR. So is it that you believe we can DFSG-sanitize main's documentation and firmware in a time frame that fits our current release schedule, that you believe you can persuade Anthony without a GR that he's empowered to continue to use sarge-ignore for such issues, or that you don't think release schedule slippage is enough of a problem to warrant a GR? It sounds like you're saying we can release sarge as-is and on-schedule without a GR, but I don't see how that's possible. Thanks, -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature