Re: Social Contract GR's Affect on sarge
On Mon, Apr 26, 2004 at 02:56:09PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> The Social Contract now states:
> ] 1. Debian will remain 100% free
> ] We provide the guidelines that we use to determine if a work is "free"
> ] in the document entitled "The Debian Free Software Guidelines". We
> ] promise that the Debian system and all its components will be free
> ] according to these guidelines. We will support people who create or
> ] use both free and non-free works on Debian. We will never make the
> ] system require the use of a non-free component.
> As this is no longer limited to "software", and as this decision was made
> by developers after and during discussion of how we should consider
> non-software content such as documentation and firmware, I don't believe I
> can justify the policy decisions to exempt documentation, firmware, or
> content any longer, as the Social Contract has been amended to cover all
> these areas.
Um, even before while it was "limited" to "software", those who were of the
opinion that documentation and such things are part of "software" still had
a fairly valid point. The new phrasing, IMO, changes nothing.
On the other hand, it's reasonable to expect that the release manager has a
say (if not the final and overriding say) in determining the interpretation
of ambiguous documents and how they apply to the release process.
Hence, if you wish to make what I feel are non sequitur conclusions with
regards to what the SC says, it's your prerogative, but don't try to blame
it on the developer body (which includes myself).
2. That which causes joy or happiness.