[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Social Contract GR's Affect on sarge

On Mon, Apr 26, 2004 at 02:35:17PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de> writes:
> > > Where are you quoted the words "preferred form for modification" from?
> > 
> > GPL
> Of course, but that only applies to GPL'd documents. 

The current context is "what is the definition of the phrase 'source
code'?" -- and we take definitions wherever we find them.

You might be thinking about copyright terms, but that's not the issue

> > > I can't find them anywhere in the Social Contract or the DFSG.
> > 
> > It's the definition of "source code" that makes the most sense.
> We are not under an obligation to have a rigid definition of "source
> code".
> The GPL, because it is a license, must try to have a single and
> unavoidable definition.  It therefore should err on the side of being
> more restrictive in its definition of "source code", to make it harder
> for people to get around its provisions.
> But the DFSG, because it is not a license, need not worry about such
> things.  We can say "source code", and then do what seems best to us
> in each particular case.  We have no obligation to have one single
> definition of the term that is rigidly applied to every situation.

So, what definition are you suggesting is more relevant here?

As an aside, here's some alternate definitions:


I don't see any which seem better in this context.


Reply to: