Re: Social Contract GR's Affect on sarge

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian-vote@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Social Contract GR's Affect on sarge
From: Matthew Garrett <mgarrett@chiark.greenend.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2004 11:09:35 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] E1BI33P-0001Y4-00@chiark.greenend.org.uk>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20040426094643.GF716@finlandia.infodrom.north.de>
References: <[🔎] 87wu43y44k.fsf@glaurung.internal.golden-gryphon.com> <[🔎] 20040426045609.GA2579@azure.humbug.org.au> <20040426091559.GA25052@mails.so.argh.org> <20040426091559.GA25052@mails.so.argh.org> <[🔎] 20040426094643.GF716@finlandia.infodrom.north.de>

Martin Schulze wrote:

>Speaking of the GFDL, only those documents released under the GNU FDL
>are non-free that make use of invariant sections for anything else
>than its license, right?

No, everything under the GFDL appears non-free.
http://people.debian.org/~srivasta/Position_Statement.xhtml discusses
this in rather more length.

-- 
Matthew Garrett | mjg59-chiark.mail.debian.devel@srcf.ucam.org

Reply to:

References:
- Results for the Editorial changes to the Social Contract GR
  - From: Debian Project Secretary <secretary@debian.org>
- Social Contract GR's Affect on sarge
  - From: Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au>
- Re: Social Contract GR's Affect on sarge
  - From: Martin Schulze <joey@infodrom.org>

Prev by Date: Re: Social Contract GR's Affect on sarge
Next by Date: Re: Social Contract GR's Affect on sarge
Previous by thread: Re: Social Contract GR's Affect on sarge
Next by thread: Re: Social Contract GR's Affect on sarge
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread