Re: "keep non-free" proposal

[tb@becket.net (Thomas Bushnell, BSG)]

Sven Luther <sven.luther@wanadoo.fr> writes:

> And i expect in future you to give back the same courtesy, and to
> distinguish from context the different meaning that are put in the word
> debian, be it the debian distribution, the debian project, the debian
> infrastructure, ..., instead of insisting that we are confusing all of
> them.

I'm not giving "compromise" two different meanings.  There are simply
two kinds of compromises that could be struck.  The old one, which has
broken down in my opinion, and perhaps a new one.

On the other hand, when saying that Debian has no non-free packages,
I'm simply repeating what I understand from the current text of the
SC, where it says that such packages are "not a part of Debian".

Thomas