Re: General Resolution: Handling of the non-free section: proposedBallot
Sven Luther <email@example.com> writes:
> I will most assuredly consider doing that. And i maintain one of the
> most non-free packages that can be. One of the seven or so binary-only
> kernel modules, which is a thing _i_ consider evil, and a threat to all
> what debian represents in the long run. And if you think about it, you
> will also see why.
Can you describe what energy you have put into finding a free