Re: General Resolution: Handling of the non-free section: proposedBallot
On 2004-03-04 15:06:30 +0000 Andreas Barth <email@example.com> wrote:
* MJ Ray (firstname.lastname@example.org) [040304 15:40]:
On 2004-03-04 11:46:14 +0000 Andreas Barth <email@example.com>
If it's so old, do we have any good numbers on it, or are both views
That's an old argument, and it's not going to be more true just
because it is repeated. Most users _can_ make the difference between
Debian and non-free.
In reality, whether or not to remove non-free will never be solved
because one side has the better arguments.
How does this relate to data on whether users can distinguish "in
non-free on a Debian mirror" and "part of the Debian operating system
So, I'm all for voting ASAP.
Fortunately, there is enough time to challenge more people making
similarly unsupported arguments against the proposed GR. Hopefully,
they will obviously avoid questions too, like "Users won't consider
debian without non-free. \\ Do we know that? \\ I like pigs."
MJR/slef My Opinion Only and possibly not of any group I know.
Please http://remember.to/edit_messages on lists to be sure I read
http://mjr.towers.org.uk/ gopher://g.towers.org.uk/ firstname.lastname@example.org
Creative copyleft computing services via http://www.ttllp.co.uk/