Re: Questions for the candidates

[Martin Michlmayr <tbm@cyrius.com>]

* Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au> [2004-03-03 14:37]:
> Hrm, you're right. I was trying to find some quotes that indicated you
> both thought that, technically, things were acceptable as they are;
> Martin's comment doesn't quite indicate that out of context. The quotes
> were meant to indicate you were of a similar mind on that issue.

I am interested in improving technical matters, and my actions and
work for Debian clearly how that (for the example my QA work).  In any
case, while I didn't mention this explicitly, I consider dpkg a "core
team" as well (even if in a slightly different sense then the others
teams).  And as you can see from
http://lists.debian.org/debian-dpkg/2004/debian-dpkg-200403/msg00002.html
some progress is slowly being made.  Also,
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2004/debian-devel-announce-200403/msg00000.html
shows you that I am interested in organizing meetings between our KDE
maintainers and putting them in closer contact with upstream, and I
have done the same for our GNOME team, and the Java people.  All of
this is aimed towards improving the technical quality in Debian.

Please keep what I said about core teams in mind and re-read
"Internal - Core Teams, Delegates, Communication, Transparency".  Many
of the points I raise there equally apply to (big) packages and other
technical matters.
-- 
Martin Michlmayr
tbm@cyrius.com