[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Proposal: Keep non-free

On Thu, Feb 26, 2004 at 12:42:04PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> Well, like said, if there is a viable non-free, with all the
> guarantees that it will stay and be well maintained, i will have no
> objections in using it. It should provide equivalent functionality to
> debian/non-free though, including BTS and PTS support. The most
> difficult problem would be in reassigning bugs between this non-free
> BTS and debian's BTS though, no idea how you plan to do that.

The most difficult?  So the debbugs package couldn't be installed on the
new server?  The mbox files for the bugs in the BTS couldn't be copied
over?  The control files on the non-free packages couldn't be updated?

Chad Walstrom <chewie@wookimus.net>           http://www.wookimus.net/
           assert(expired(knowledge)); /* core dump */

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: