Raul Miller wrote:
If Linux were on the majority of all desktops, I might buy into the idea that getting rid of non-free would benefit the majority of users. But, right now, the so many users use stuff so much less free than our "non-free" that that concept seems a bit silly.
Is it very clever(ethical) to increase users dependency on non-free even more? Is it clever(ethical) to spend resources on non-free? Whith a little effort Debian can become the first free distibution in the world. This will be a great day.
-- Best regards, Sergey Spiridonov