Re: non-free and users?
Raul Miller wrote:
If Linux were on the majority of all desktops, I might buy into the
idea that getting rid of non-free would benefit the majority of users.
But, right now, the so many users use stuff so much less free than our
"non-free" that that concept seems a bit silly.
Is it very clever(ethical) to increase users dependency on non-free even
more? Is it clever(ethical) to spend resources on non-free? Whith a
little effort Debian can become the first free distibution in the world.
This will be a great day.
Best regards, Sergey Spiridonov