[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: summary of software licenses in non-free

On Tue, Jan 13, 2004 at 10:13:25AM +1100, Craig Sanders wrote:
> > If they fail our own guidelines for Free Software they are not free, hence
> > non-free.  Calling them semi-free suggest that they are not, which is wrong.
> > Calling them so is only sham and will contribute to confusion.
> tell me, is grey black or is it white?

Grey's certainly "non-white". You might also call it "semi-white"


Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.

               Linux.conf.au 2004 -- Because we can.
           http://conf.linux.org.au/ -- Jan 12-17, 2004

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: