Re: non-free and users?
Raul Miller wrote:
But, value statements are best judged locally -- it's really up to
the user to decide whether the potential harm from a non-DFSG license
outweighs whatever other issues the user is dealing with.
So the real question should be "does non-free harm users more than it
helps them?" And the real answer should come from the users.
Shouldn't the real question be "Is distributing non-free compatible with
Debian developer ethics?"
Best regards, Sergey Spiridonov