[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [Proposal] Updating the Social Contract

On Sun, Jan 11, 2004 at 01:05:00PM +0000, MJ Ray wrote:
> It would have been helpful to describe your changes. 


> Are DFSG 7 and 9 also required for entry into non-free?

Good point.

> I oppose this proposal because it increases confusion about what is 
> part of the distribution and increases the conflict with the first 
> clause of the social contract.

So do I.  I think I can do better, but I'm still working on it.



Reply to: