Re: summary of software licenses in non-free
On 2004-01-10 12:41:48 +0000 Sven Luther <email@example.com>
It would be interesting to split into classes "no commercial", "no
modification", "patent", "compatibility", "notification" and "other"
what is compatibility for ?
Packages that you are allowed to modify, distribute or similar, but
must retain compatibility with some published standard or the original
Also, "classes" is incorrect, as some will be in more than one. I
should have suggested sets.
MJR/slef My Opinion Only and possibly not of any group I know.
Please http://remember.to/edit_messages on lists to be sure I read
http://mjr.towers.org.uk/ gopher://g.towers.org.uk/ firstname.lastname@example.org
Creative copyleft computing services via http://www.ttllp.co.uk/