[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: summary of software licenses in non-free

On 2004-01-10 12:41:48 +0000 Sven Luther <sven.luther@wanadoo.fr> wrote:

It would be interesting to split into classes "no commercial", "no modification", "patent", "compatibility", "notification" and "other" at first glance.
what is compatibility for ?

Packages that you are allowed to modify, distribute or similar, but must retain compatibility with some published standard or the original version.

Also, "classes" is incorrect, as some will be in more than one. I should have suggested sets.

MJR/slef     My Opinion Only and possibly not of any group I know.
Please http://remember.to/edit_messages on lists to be sure I read
http://mjr.towers.org.uk/ gopher://g.towers.org.uk/ slef@jabber.at
 Creative copyleft computing services via http://www.ttllp.co.uk/

Reply to: