Re: GR: Removal of non-free
On Thu, 8 Jan 2004 14:54:07 -0500, Branden Robinson <firstname.lastname@example.org> said:
> On Sun, Jan 04, 2004 at 03:58:28PM +0000, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
>> Acroread can't be distributed - Adobe changed the licence
>> conditions under which their Acrobat reader could be distributed.
> I confess I have to wonder how many people who are inclined to vote
> in favor of retaining non-free do so to preserve our users' access
> to software that isn't actually in it.
Yes, your opposition is obviously stupid and ignorant, and
liable to take such funny and idiotic stances.
This is getting to be quite droll.
Anger kills as surely as the other vices.
Manoj Srivastava <email@example.com> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C